![]() ![]() ![]() This is in the BIOS, but since I don't know specifically which model Satellite A105 you have (the sub-model number determines which BIOS to use), I can't be sure. A couple of possible issues I want to warn you about before you start: your laptop may be specifically excluding 1440x900 as an allowable resolution. ![]() I can't imagine lategame SC2 fights being GPU capped.Okay. If you're getting noticeable framerate drop with that kind of processor on low, there's something wrong with the CPU (dust maybe) that is affecting performance.Įdit: I think most people say tomshardware is pretty bad. That said, your CPU should drop, but it should be easily playable on low. A lot of the late game lag is probably CPU based, so at that point the tables on notebookcheck don't even matter. And GPU scenarios don't scale nearly as badly as CPU the later you get into the game. That has nothing to do with the CPU, it purely indicates the game is playable for the HD4000. The purpose of the GPU test is purely to see what can run the game in a worst case scenario, for the GPU. Stock sandy bridge drops on ultra down to ~30, but you're on low. However, I don't think an i7 950 or any i7 should drop on low while overclocked. Obviously, any processor will drop in lategame. Well GPU capped scenario doesn't necessarily mean realistic. Tomshardware stated sc2 fights were GPU capped at one point, and i doubt you are getting the well over 100fps posted on anything but early game on a laptop regardless of GPU and graphics settings, My overclocked i7 950 drops below that in lategame 1v1 on low pretty frequently ![]() (Not that any of this is relevant hahaha.) I think they should be ok in Desktops, but mobile might be more important for APUs. With how close HD4000 brought intel to Trinity vs HD3000 and Llano, AMD better bring some big improvements if they want to stay ahead of Intel in the mobile space. Kind of worried for Haswell for AMD though. So desktop Trinity will probably roll over the HD4000 completely. The HD4000 barely loses to mobile Trinity, but gets stomped by roughly the same or higher margin by desktop Llano. The 173FPS is likely from a mobile CPU, if its a desktop CPU, a normal mobile HD4000 will actually perform better.ĪMD's Trinity DOES do that. The ULV parts will certainly be clocked lower, but you already knew that. So the HD4000 in mobile parts actually performs better, and that's what you see benchmarked. Intel puts their highest clocked IGPU into their notebook models - the HD4000 in the mobile CPUs is actually clocked higher than the desktop counterparts on the i7-3770k. With AMD's trinity, it is, but not with the HD4000. Thank you.Įdit : I found some benchmarks () but only with high and medium graphic setting with quite high resolution, plus no information of the kind of benchmark procedure (whole replay, during a 200/200 fight etc), so more insight would be great. If you have any experience with the aforementioned gpu or any link to a sc2 benchmark, please let me know. The laptop will mostly be used for school, as I already have a good gaming desktop, but I wonder if sc2 can run well with a low-end gpu, as it is mostly cpu limited. What I mean with "acceptable framerate" would be like ~50 fps in the midgame with all graphic settings on low and something like 1280x720 for resolution. Intel has made good progress with its hd graphics on their last ivy bridge processors, but i cannot find any sc2 benchmark with a hd4000 on a 3610qm for instance. #1 I plan on buying an ultrabook in the near future (probably the asus ux21a soon to be released), and I was wondering if there is a possibilty to run sc2 on an integrated gpu with acceptable framerate. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |